1. is the topic interesting 1
2. is the title original and appropriate 2
3. is the introduction complete? 1
4. is the body of the article complete? 1
5. is the conclusion well-developed? 1
6. is the article well-organized overall? 1
7. is the article easy to read? 2
8. is the article interesting to read? 1
9. has the writer plagiarized material? 3

Do you feel that the writer has improved the article/advertorial? Why or why not? Be specific.
- Yes, because improve the two things the writer should improve from the first review.

Has the writer changed the article/advertorial adequately according to your suggestions for improvement of your first assesment? Describe the changes and state specifically whether you think they are an improvement.
- The introduction might be a bit long comparing to the whole article.
Roderick makes the introduction a bit shorter.
- The “Hotmail-text” is that an advertisement?
Yes it is!!

Are you happy to have this article/advertorial on your weblog? Why or why not? Be specific.
- Yes, because it’s a interesting topic and it’s been written well.